Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs o3
o3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 3 categories and o3 in 5 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where o3 leads 54.6 to 41.9.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | o3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 47.5 |
| Released | — | 2025-04-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $8 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 63 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o3 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76), o3: 46.8 (#64)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1408 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 62.3% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 58.4% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 81.3% |
| GSO | — | 8.8% |
| WeirdML | — | 52.4% |
| CadEval | — | 74% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 933.55 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, o3: 34.5 (#44)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | 1144 |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 63% |
| GDPval | — | 30.8% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 45.2% |
| OSWorld | — | 23% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 65.4% |
Reasoning o3 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211), o3: 32.0 (#78)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1402 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 6.5% |
| SimpleBench | — | 53.1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 67.6% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 60.8% |
| CritPt | — | 1.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 38% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 13.1% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 29% |
| DTBench | — | 84.8% |
| LMCA | — | 39.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.86 |
| ForecastBench | — | 62.5 |
Math o3 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92), o3: 50.2 (#58)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1426 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 33.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 71.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 97.8% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 18.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge o3 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102), o3: 54.6 (#52)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | 1402 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 81.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 20.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 49.4% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 85.9% |
| Confabulations | — | 14.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 75.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, o3: 41.4 (#36)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1214 |
| GeoBench | — | 74% |
| VPCT | — | 52% |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29), o3: 51.7 (#105)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | 1401 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | 1437 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | 1430 |
| LMArena German | 1470 | 1420 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | 1403 |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | 1370 |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | 1406 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1395 |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37), o3: 72.8 (#127)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1368 |
| IFEval | — | 86.9% |
Long Context o3 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59), o3: 53.3 (#6)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1372 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 88.9% |
| CL-bench | — | 17.8% |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52), o3: 63.5 (#64)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1410 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | 1359 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1405 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 83.9% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1676 |
| WildBench | — | 86.1% |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than o3?
o3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.1 or o3 better for coding?
o3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 44.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and o3 share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and o3 has 63.