Model comparison

ERNIE 5.1 vs o3

o3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.1 Baidu

43.8

Rank #83 Confirmed

o3 OpenAI

47.5

Rank #61 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 3 categories and o3 in 5 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where o3 leads 54.6 to 41.9.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.1 and o3 specifications
ERNIE 5.1o3
ProviderBaiduOpenAI
Noometry Index43.847.5
Released—2025-04-16
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—200K
Max output—100K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$8
Results tracked1963

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o3 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76), o3: 46.8 (#64)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1o3
LMArena Coding14881408
SWE-bench Verified—62.3%
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—58.4%
Aider Polyglot—81.3%
GSO—8.8%
WeirdML—52.4%
CadEval—74%
ALE-Bench—933.55

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

ERNIE 5.1: —, o3: 34.5 (#44)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1o3
LMArena Search12271144
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—63%
GDPval—30.8%
DeepResearch Bench—45.2%
OSWorld—23%
METR Time Horizons—65.4%

Reasoning o3 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211), o3: 32.0 (#78)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1o3
LMArena Hard Prompts14811402
ARC-AGI-2—6.5%
SimpleBench—53.1%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—67.6%
NYT Connections (extended)23.4%—
ARC-AGI-1—60.8%
CritPt—1.4%
Chess Puzzles—38%
EnigmaEval—13.1%
Mystery Game Puzzles—29%
DTBench—84.8%
LMCA—39.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.86
ForecastBench—62.5

Math o3 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92), o3: 50.2 (#58)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1o3
LMArena Math14811426
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—33.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—84.4%
Omni-MATH—71.4%
MATH Level 5—97.8%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—18.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—2.1%

Knowledge o3 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102), o3: 54.6 (#52)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1o3
LMArena Expert14921402
GPQA Diamond—81.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—20.3%
SimpleQA Verified—49.4%
MMLU-Pro—85.9%
Confabulations—14.4%
GPQA (HELM)—75.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

ERNIE 5.1: —, o3: 41.4 (#36)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1o3
LMArena Vision—1214
GeoBench—74%
VPCT—52%

Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29), o3: 51.7 (#105)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1o3
LMArena Non-English14541401
LMArena Chinese15081437
LMArena French14881430
LMArena German14701420
LMArena Japanese14221403
LMArena Korean14271370
LMArena Russian14591406
LMArena Spanish14731395

Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37), o3: 72.8 (#127)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1o3
LMArena Instruction Following14601368
IFEval—86.9%

Long Context o3 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59), o3: 53.3 (#6)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1o3
LMArena Longer Query14621372
Fiction.LiveBench—88.9%
CL-bench—17.8%

Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52), o3: 63.5 (#64)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1o3
LMArena Text14681410
LMArena Creative Writing14411359
LMArena Multi-Turn14711405
Short-Story Creative Writing—83.9%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1676
WildBench—86.1%

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.1 better than o3?

o3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.1 or o3 better for coding?

o3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 44.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and o3 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and o3 has 63.

Related comparisons

Go deeper