Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs Gemini 2.0 Pro
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation Institute
GoogleSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 2.0 Pro in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 52.7 to 29.3.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.0 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 38.6 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | 2025-02-05 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 35.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 63.5% |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.89 | 135.06 |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 60.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 68% |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| LiveBench | — | 65.1% |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | — | 71% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 83.5% |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 18.4% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 83.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 41.7% |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 44.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than Gemini 2.0 Pro?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Gemini 2.0 Pro share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14.