Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) vs Gemini 2.0 Pro
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher in 1 category and Gemini 2.0 Pro in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 39.7 to 25.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 70.4% for Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and 83.5% for Gemini 2.0 Pro.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Gemini 2.0 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 32.1 | 39.1 |
| Released | 2024-02-15 | 2025-02-05 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 45 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 34.2 (#241), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 35.6% |
| WeirdML | 22.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 63.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1294 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.5% | — |
| CadEval | 34% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 79.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.6% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 17.9 (#145), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 3.4% | — |
| Cybench | 7.5% | — |
| BALROG | 21% | — |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 12.3 (#338), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.73 | 135.06 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 27.1% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 60.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1296 | — |
| DTBench | 59% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 68% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 89.2% | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 65.1% |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 25.8 (#266), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 70.4% | 83.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 23.1% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 36.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 71% |
| LMArena Math | 1315 | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 29.4 (#239), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 57.2% | 65.7% |
| Confabulations | 13.5% | 18.4% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 53.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1279 | — |
| MMLU | 86.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 36.8 (#77), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1161 | — |
| Video-MME | 75% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 45.3 (#174), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1312 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1331 | — |
| LMArena French | 1302 | — |
| LMArena German | 1286 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1292 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1320 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1311 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 68.6 (#185), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 83.4% |
| IFEval | 83.7% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | — |
Long Context Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 39.8 (#169), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 41.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1308 | — |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 52.4 (#172), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1319 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1333 | — |
| WildBench | 81.3% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1296 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 44.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) better than Gemini 2.0 Pro?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) or Gemini 2.0 Pro better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and Gemini 2.0 Pro share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) has 45 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14.