Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Pixtral Large
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and Pixtral Large in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 52.7 to 32.9.
- Pixtral Large has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Pixtral Large | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 32.2 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Pixtral Large: 21.7 (#218)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | 0.8% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Pixtral Large: 30.6 (#111)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1089 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Pixtral Large: 32.9 (#278)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 988 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Pixtral Large?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Pixtral Large share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Pixtral Large has 3.