Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs Gemma 3 12B

Falcon-180B and Gemma 3 12B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.2 vs 32.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 12B Google

32.1

Rank #262 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 1 category and Gemma 3 12B in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemma 3 12B leads 45.7 to 25.2.

Side by side

Falcon-180B and Gemma 3 12B specifications
Falcon-180BGemma 3 12B
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteGoogle
Noometry Index32.232.1
Released2023-09-062025-03-12
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.05
Output $ / M tokens—$0.15
Results tracked1624

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Gemma 3 12B: 31.7 (#280)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemma 3 12B
SciCode—17.4%
LMArena Coding—1281

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Gemma 3 12B: 25.5 (#108)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemma 3 12B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—30.4%

Reasoning Falcon-180B leads

Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Gemma 3 12B: 15.7 (#313)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemma 3 12B
LMArena Hard Prompts10071309
Epoch Capabilities Index112.13123.5
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles—0%
DTBench—48.8%
LMCA—4.5%
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
PIQA84.9%—
WinoGrande87.1%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Gemma 3 12B: 22.3 (#279)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemma 3 12B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—16.7%
LMArena Math—1307
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Gemma 3 12B: 26.5 (#257)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemma 3 12B
GPQA Diamond—39.5%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—4.4%
LMArena Expert—1248
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%—
BoolQ89%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Gemma 3 12B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemma 3 12B
MindCube—46.7%

Multilingual Gemma 3 12B leads

Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Gemma 3 12B: 45.7 (#165)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemma 3 12B
LMArena Non-English10001318
LMArena German—1370
LMArena Russian—1335

Instruction Following Gemma 3 12B leads

Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Gemma 3 12B: 68.6 (#186)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemma 3 12B
LMArena Instruction Following10471299

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Gemma 3 12B: 40.0 (#162)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemma 3 12B
LMArena Longer Query—1317

Writing & Preference Gemma 3 12B leads

Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Gemma 3 12B: 47.5 (#209)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemma 3 12B
LMArena Text10541334
LMArena Creative Writing10891331
LMArena Multi-Turn10131334
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1126

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than Gemma 3 12B?

Falcon-180B and Gemma 3 12B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.2 vs 32.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Gemma 3 12B share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 12B has 24.

Related comparisons

Go deeper