Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs Llama 3.1-405B

Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.1-405B Meta

30.7

Rank #288 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 1 category and Llama 3.1-405B in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Llama 3.1-405B leads 40.7 to 25.2.

Side by side

Falcon-180B and Llama 3.1-405B specifications
Falcon-180BLlama 3.1-405B
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteMeta
Noometry Index32.230.7
Released2023-09-062024-07-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1642

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Llama 3.1-405B: 33.1 (#262)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BLlama 3.1-405B
WeirdML—21.4%
LMArena Coding—1291

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Llama 3.1-405B: 21.0 (#140)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BLlama 3.1-405B
TheAgentCompany—7.4%
Cybench—7.5%

Reasoning Falcon-180B leads

Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Llama 3.1-405B: 16.8 (#300)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BLlama 3.1-405B
LMArena Hard Prompts10071269
Epoch Capabilities Index112.13128.75
HellaSwag89%89.2%
PIQA84.9%85.9%
WinoGrande87.1%89.2%
SimpleBench—23%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—45%
DTBench—61.4%
BIG-Bench Hard—82.9%
ForecastBench—59.9
LAMBADA79.8%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Llama 3.1-405B: 18.4 (#290)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BLlama 3.1-405B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—9.7%
Omni-MATH—24.9%
LMArena Math—1281
MATH Level 5—49.8%
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Llama 3.1-405B: 30.4 (#227)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BLlama 3.1-405B
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%95.3%
MMLU70.6%84.5%
GPQA Diamond—50.9%
MMLU-Pro—72.3%
Confabulations—17.6%
GPQA (HELM)—52.2%
LMArena Expert—1243
BoolQ89%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—
TriviaQA—82.7%

Multilingual Llama 3.1-405B leads

Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Llama 3.1-405B: 40.7 (#214)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BLlama 3.1-405B
LMArena Non-English10001248
LMArena Chinese—1242
LMArena French—1279
LMArena German—1252
LMArena Japanese—1208
LMArena Korean—1184
LMArena Russian—1265
LMArena Spanish—1260

Instruction Following Llama 3.1-405B leads

Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Llama 3.1-405B: 65.9 (#214)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BLlama 3.1-405B
LMArena Instruction Following10471259
IFEval—81.1%

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Llama 3.1-405B: 38.4 (#197)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BLlama 3.1-405B
LMArena Longer Query—1266

Writing & Preference Llama 3.1-405B leads

Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Llama 3.1-405B: 38.9 (#251)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BLlama 3.1-405B
LMArena Text10541284
LMArena Creative Writing10891262
LMArena Multi-Turn10131297
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—870
WildBench—78.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than Llama 3.1-405B?

Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Llama 3.1-405B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1-405B has 42.

Related comparisons

Go deeper