Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs Yi-1.5-34B
Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation InstituteSummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Yi-1.5-34B leads 37.4 to 29.1.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | Yi-1.5-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 30.6 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | 2024-05-13 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 32.4 (#272)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.9% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1169 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 43.8% |
Reasoning Yi-1.5-34B leads
Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Yi-1.5-34B: 22.5 (#191)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1160 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 27.5 (#249)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1182 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 25.5% |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#295)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 32% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1144 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multilingual Yi-1.5-34B leads
Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.3 (#256)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1213 |
| LMArena French | — | 1156 |
| LMArena German | — | 1111 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1021 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1005 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1091 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1121 |
Instruction Following Yi-1.5-34B leads
Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.2 (#257)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1139 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#248)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1143 |
Writing & Preference Yi-1.5-34B leads
Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.4 (#257)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1173 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1135 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1153 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than Yi-1.5-34B?
Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Yi-1.5-34B share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.