Model comparison
Codestral vs Falcon-180B
Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Codestral | Falcon-180B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Technology Innovation Institute |
| Noometry Index | 30.6 | 32.2 |
| Released | 2024-05-29 | 2023-09-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.90 | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Codestral: 27.3 (#321), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | Codestral | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 11.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 41.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 137.78 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 73.8% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.9% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Codestral: 19.8 (#251), Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 32.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1007 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 112.13 |
| HellaSwag | — | 89% |
| LAMBADA | — | 79.8% |
| PIQA | — | 84.9% |
| WinoGrande | — | 87.1% |
Math Not comparable
Codestral: —, Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | Codestral | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| GSM8K | — | 54.4% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codestral: —, Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | Codestral | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 67.8% |
| BoolQ | — | 89% |
| MMLU | — | 70.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 64.2% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Codestral: —, Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1000 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Codestral: —, Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1047 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Codestral: —, Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1054 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1089 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1013 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codestral better than Falcon-180B?
Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Codestral and Falcon-180B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Falcon-180B has 16.