Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs o3-pro
o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.7 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation InstituteSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and o3-pro in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where o3-pro leads 57.1 to 29.3.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | o3-pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 42.7 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | 2025-06-10 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $80 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, o3-pro: 55.1 (#22)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 84.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 58.2% |
Reasoning o3-pro leads
Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266), o3-pro: 24.1 (#152)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.89 | 147.43 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4.9% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 59.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | — |
| DTBench | — | 86.9% |
| LMCA | — | 38.5% |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, o3-pro: 29.0 (#234)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Confabulations | — | 14.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.3% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, o3-pro: 72.1 (#1)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 97.2% |
Writing & Preference o3-pro leads
Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290), o3-pro: 57.1 (#128)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 84.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than o3-pro?
o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.7 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and o3-pro share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and o3-pro has 12.