Model comparison
Laguna M.1 vs o3-pro
o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.7 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
PoolsideSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where o3-pro leads 55.1 to 36.4.
- Laguna M.1 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 200K.
- Laguna M.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Laguna M.1 | o3-pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 42.7 |
| Released | 2026-04-28 | 2025-06-10 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 200K |
| Max output | 33K | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $80 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o3-pro leads
Laguna M.1: 36.4 (#195), o3-pro: 55.1 (#22)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 84.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1348 | — |
| WeirdML | — | 58.2% |
Reasoning o3-pro leads
Laguna M.1: 21.9 (#187), o3-pro: 24.1 (#152)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4.9% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 59.3% |
| DTBench | — | 86.9% |
| LMCA | — | 38.5% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.43 |
Math Not comparable
Laguna M.1: 20.3 (#276), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, o3-pro: 29.0 (#234)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Confabulations | — | 14.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.3% |
Long Context Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, o3-pro: 72.1 (#1)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 97.2% |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, o3-pro: 57.1 (#128)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 84.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Laguna M.1 better than o3-pro?
o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.7 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Laguna M.1 or o3-pro better for coding?
o3-pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.1 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Laguna M.1 does, with 262K tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and o3-pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and o3-pro has 12.