Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Falcon-180B and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.8 vs 31.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads 46.9 to 29.3.

Side by side

Falcon-180B and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct specifications
Falcon-180BQwen2.5 72B Instruct
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index31.831.5
Released2023-09-062024-09
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.40
Output $ / M tokens—$5.60
Results tracked1643

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 32.8 (#256)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen2.5 72B Instruct
WeirdML—16%
BigCodeBench Instruct—45.8%
LMArena Coding—1293
BigCodeBench Complete—55.9%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 22.0 (#124)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen2.5 72B Instruct
TheAgentCompany—5.7%
BALROG—16.2%
METR Time Horizons—35.8%

Reasoning Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads

Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 21.4 (#197)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10071271
Epoch Capabilities Index111.89129.01
HellaSwag89%84.8%
PIQA84.9%82.6%
WinoGrande87.1%82.3%
DTBench—62.9%
LMCA—13.4%
BIG-Bench Hard—79.8%
ForecastBench—57.5
LAMBADA79.8%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 18.1 (#281)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen2.5 72B Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—8.1%
Omni-MATH—33%
LMArena Math—1283
MATH Level 5—63.2%
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 26.9 (#247)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen2.5 72B Instruct
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%94.5%
MMLU70.6%85.3%
GPQA Diamond—49.1%
MMLU-Pro—63.1%
Confabulations—19.1%
GPQA (HELM)—42.6%
LMArena Expert—1245
BoolQ89%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—
TriviaQA—71.9%

Multilingual Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads

Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 41.2 (#208)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Non-English10001252
LMArena Chinese—1272
LMArena French—1279
LMArena German—1234
LMArena Japanese—1180
LMArena Korean—1188
LMArena Russian—1264
LMArena Spanish—1255

Instruction Following Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads

Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 65.7 (#216)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10471254
IFEval—80.6%

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 38.9 (#183)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—1282

Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads

Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 46.9 (#210)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BQwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Text10541269
LMArena Creative Writing10891221
LMArena Multi-Turn10131272
WildBench—80.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Falcon-180B and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.8 vs 31.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has 43.

Related comparisons

Go deeper