Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.1 vs 31.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 36 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 36 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads 22.3 to 12.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 23.1% for Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and 8.1% for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 32.1 | 31.9 |
| Released | 2024-02-15 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $5.60 |
| Results tracked | 45 | 43 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 34.2 (#241), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 33.2 (#260)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 22.2% | 16% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.8% | 45.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1294 | 1292 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.5% | 55.9% |
| CadEval | 34% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 79.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.6% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 17.9 (#145), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 22.1 (#133)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 3.4% | 5.7% |
| BALROG | 21% | 16.2% |
| Cybench | 7.5% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 35.8% |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 12.3 (#338), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 22.3 (#199)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1296 | 1271 |
| DTBench | 59% | 62.9% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 89.2% | 79.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.73 | 129 |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | 57.5 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 27.1% | — |
| LMCA | — | 13.4% |
| HellaSwag | — | 84.8% |
| PIQA | — | 82.6% |
| WinoGrande | — | 82.3% |
Math Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 25.8 (#266), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 19.3 (#287)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 23.1% | 8.1% |
| Omni-MATH | 36.4% | 33% |
| LMArena Math | 1315 | 1283 |
| MATH Level 5 | 70.4% | 63.2% |
Knowledge Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 29.4 (#239), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 27.0 (#253)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 57.2% | 49.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | 63.1% |
| Confabulations | 13.5% | 19.1% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 53.4% | 42.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1279 | 1245 |
| MMLU | 86.9% | 85.3% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.6% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 94.5% |
| TriviaQA | — | 71.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 36.8 (#77), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1161 | — |
| Video-MME | 75% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 45.3 (#174), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 41.0 (#213)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1312 | 1252 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1331 | 1272 |
| LMArena French | 1302 | 1280 |
| LMArena German | 1286 | 1234 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1292 | 1180 |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | 1188 |
| LMArena Russian | 1320 | 1264 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1311 | 1256 |
Instruction Following Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 68.6 (#185), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 65.5 (#221)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 83.7% | 80.6% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1254 |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 39.8 (#169), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 38.9 (#188)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1308 | 1282 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 52.4 (#172), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 46.7 (#215)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1319 | 1269 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1333 | 1221 |
| WildBench | 81.3% | 80.2% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1296 | 1272 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) better than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.1 vs 31.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (34.2 vs 33.2); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct share?
36 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) has 45 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has 43.