Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs GLM-5.3

GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 1.0 Pro Google

27.3

Rank #332 Confirmed

GLM-5.3 Z.ai (Zhipu)

54.8

Rank #26 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5.3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GLM-5.3 leads 62.3 to 9.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 91.1% for GLM-5.3.
  • GLM-5.3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 1.0 ProGLM-5.3
ProviderGoogleZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index27.354.8
Released2023-12-132026-08-14
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.40
Output $ / M tokens—$4.40
Results tracked2442

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5.3 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), GLM-5.3: 59.5 (#14)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGLM-5.3
LMArena Coding11081496
DeepSWE—69%
FrontierCode—40.1%
CursorBench—42.6%
LMArena WebDev—1622
FrontierSWE—30.2%
SciCode—59%
WeirdML—75.4%
ALE-Bench—1,317
HumanEval+55.5%—
MBPP+61.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, GLM-5.3: 36.4 (#38)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGLM-5.3
APEX-Agents—56.6%
Vending-Bench 2—8,164

Reasoning GLM-5.3 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), GLM-5.3: 46.1 (#46)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGLM-5.3
LMArena Hard Prompts11091489
DTBench45.9%87.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index117.04155.61
NYT Connections (extended)—74.2%
CritPt—19.1%
Chess Puzzles—21%
Mystery Game Puzzles—33%
LMCA—55.5%
Bench to the Future 3—0.15

Math GLM-5.3 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), GLM-5.3: 62.3 (#33)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGLM-5.3
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%91.1%
LMArena Math11321489
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—68.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4—29.3%
ProofBench—49%
MATH Level 511.2%—

Knowledge GLM-5.3 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), GLM-5.3: 58.3 (#37)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGLM-5.3
GPQA Diamond34%90.9%
LMArena Expert10591516
SimpleQA Verified—41%
MMLU70%—

Multilingual GLM-5.3 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), GLM-5.3: 55.7 (#28)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGLM-5.3
LMArena Non-English11381457
LMArena Chinese11241528
LMArena French11451499
LMArena German11251499
LMArena Japanese10231453
LMArena Russian11861463
LMArena Spanish11191460
LMArena Korean—1472

Instruction Following GLM-5.3 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), GLM-5.3: 77.5 (#23)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGLM-5.3
LMArena Instruction Following11141477

Long Context GLM-5.3 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), GLM-5.3: 45.4 (#41)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGLM-5.3
LMArena Longer Query11321482

Writing & Preference GLM-5.3 leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), GLM-5.3: 75.7 (#6)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGLM-5.3
LMArena Text11491471
LMArena Creative Writing11311457
LMArena Multi-Turn11391472
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—2075

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than GLM-5.3?

GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or GLM-5.3 better for coding?

GLM-5.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.5 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and GLM-5.3 share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5.3 has 42.

Related comparisons

Go deeper