Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Qwen3-1.7B
Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen3-1.7B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (27.3 vs 26.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-1.7B in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3-1.7B leads 16.3 to 9.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 8.1% for Qwen3-1.7B.
- Qwen3-1.7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3-1.7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 26.6 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 4 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.4% |
Reasoning Qwen3-1.7B leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | — |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |
Math Qwen3-1.7B leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 8.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3-1.7B leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 38% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | — |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Qwen3-1.7B?
Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen3-1.7B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (27.3 vs 26.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen3-1.7B share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.