Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Grok 4.6
Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.6 in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4.6 leads 67.0 to 14.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 4.6% for Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and 99.2% for Grok 4.6.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Grok 4.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 29.9 | 56.9 |
| Released | 2024-10-03 | 2026-08-12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 500K |
| Max output | — | 500K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 49 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.6 leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 35.5 (#225), Grok 4.6: 58.5 (#16)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1218 | 1465 |
| DeepSWE | — | 67.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 48% |
| CursorBench | — | 41.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1617 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 25.3% |
| SciCode | — | 56.5% |
| WeirdML | — | 67.3% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,508 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: —, Grok 4.6: 39.4 (#27)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 65.3% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 17.2% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 9,047 |
Reasoning Grok 4.6 leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 20.0 (#244), Grok 4.6: 61.4 (#20)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1209 | 1447 |
| DTBench | 50% | 97.3% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 67.1% |
| SimpleBench | — | 75.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 80% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 87.5% |
| CritPt | — | 19.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 40% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 30.5% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 34% |
| LMCA | — | 48.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 156.44 |
Math Grok 4.6 leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 14.2 (#302), Grok 4.6: 67.0 (#24)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.6% | 99.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1207 | 1423 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 66% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 31.7% |
| ProofBench | — | 51% |
Knowledge Grok 4.6 leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 16.0 (#289), Grok 4.6: 63.3 (#20)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | 94% |
| LMArena Expert | 1185 | 1467 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 49.3% |
Multimodal Grok 4.6 leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 28.2 (#115), Grok 4.6: 43.6 (#23)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1044 | 1263 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 33.2% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 40% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1452 |
Multilingual Grok 4.6 leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 38.5 (#229), Grok 4.6: 53.0 (#74)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1215 | 1420 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1231 | 1480 |
| LMArena French | 1234 | 1461 |
| LMArena German | 1206 | 1431 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1150 | 1376 |
| LMArena Korean | 1140 | 1397 |
| LMArena Russian | 1236 | 1422 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1212 | 1404 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.6 leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 62.8 (#236), Grok 4.6: 75.4 (#63)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1199 | 1431 |
Long Context Grok 4.6 leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 37.0 (#225), Grok 4.6: 44.5 (#66)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 1454 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.6 leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 42.8 (#232), Grok 4.6: 62.3 (#80)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1226 | 1428 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1218 | 1428 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1185 | 1425 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B better than Grok 4.6?
Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or Grok 4.6 better for coding?
Grok 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.5 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Grok 4.6 share?
21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has 21 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.6 has 49.