Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) vs Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher in 1 category and Grok 4.7 in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.7 leads 40.1 to 12.3.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 46.6 |
| Released | 2024-02-15 | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 500K |
| Max output | — | 500K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 45 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.7 leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 33.8 (#239), Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1294 | 1423 |
| CursorBench | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1636 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 29.5% |
| SciCode | — | 57.4% |
| WeirdML | 22.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.5% | — |
| CadEval | 34% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 79.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.6% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 17.8 (#137), Grok 4.7: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 3.4% | — |
| Cybench | 7.5% | — |
| BALROG | 21% | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 12.3 (#332), Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1296 | 1409 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 27.1% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 76.8% |
| CritPt | — | 17.7% |
| DTBench | 59% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 89.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.73 | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |
Math Grok 4.7 leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 24.4 (#260), Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1315 | 1393 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 23.1% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 34% |
| Omni-MATH | 36.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 70.4% | — |
Knowledge Grok 4.7 leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 29.3 (#228), Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1279 | 1413 |
| GPQA Diamond | 57.2% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 13.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 53.4% | — |
| MMLU | 86.9% | — |
Multimodal Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 36.2 (#72), Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1161 | — |
| Video-MME | 75% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20.8% |
Multilingual Grok 4.7 leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 45.5 (#169), Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1312 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1331 | 1476 |
| LMArena Russian | 1320 | 1396 |
| LMArena French | 1301 | — |
| LMArena German | 1286 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1292 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1310 | — |
Instruction Following Grok 4.7 leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 68.8 (#180), Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1406 |
| IFEval | 83.7% | — |
Long Context Grok 4.7 leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 39.7 (#164), Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1308 | 1416 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 52.5 (#167), Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1319 | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1333 | 1391 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1296 | 1389 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2007 |
| WildBench | 81.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) better than Grok 4.7?
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) or Grok 4.7 better for coding?
Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and Grok 4.7 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) has 45 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 21.