Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Kimi K3
Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K3 in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K3 leads 63.0 to 22.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 52.5% for Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and 91.2% for Kimi K3.
- Kimi K3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Kimi K3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | |
| Noometry Index | 37.8 | 59.5 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2026-07-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 1.05M |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $3 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $15 |
| Results tracked | 32 | 53 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185), Kimi K3: 61.0 (#10)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1508 |
| DeepSWE | — | 68.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 44.2% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1654 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 25.9% |
| SciCode | — | 59.5% |
| WeirdML | — | 82.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | 47.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,524 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: —, Kimi K3: 41.8 (#20)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 50.6% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 37.1% |
| PostTrainBench | — | 32% |
| GBAEval | — | 48.3% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 19% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,165 |
Reasoning Kimi K3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210), Kimi K3: 63.0 (#17)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1324 | 1496 |
| DTBench | 52.5% | 91.2% |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | 61.1 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 60.4% |
| SimpleBench | — | 60.7% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 93.6% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 94.5% |
| CritPt | — | 23.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 39% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.1% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 26% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65.5% | — |
| LMCA | — | 52.7% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 95% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 157.45 |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |
Math Kimi K3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196), Kimi K3: 74.2 (#16)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1309 | 1491 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 72.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 39% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 87.8% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 97.2% |
| ProofBench | — | 87% |
| Omni-MATH | 37.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 58.1% | — |
Knowledge Kimi K3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189), Kimi K3: 63.2 (#21)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1305 | 1521 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 93.1% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 50.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | 72% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50% | — |
Multimodal Kimi K3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109), Kimi K3: 37.8 (#70)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1100 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 29.5% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 34.2% |
Multilingual Kimi K3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161), Kimi K3: 56.3 (#21)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1323 | 1466 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1339 | 1529 |
| LMArena French | 1347 | 1491 |
| LMArena German | 1306 | 1488 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1301 | 1487 |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | 1458 |
| LMArena Russian | 1328 | 1482 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1313 | 1472 |
Instruction Following Kimi K3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163), Kimi K3: 77.7 (#14)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1305 | 1483 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 78.3% | — |
| IFEval | 82.4% | — |
Long Context Kimi K3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160), Kimi K3: 45.8 (#29)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1320 | 1494 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K3 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177), Kimi K3: 76.6 (#4)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1330 | 1476 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1454 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1307 | 1488 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2082 |
| WildBench | 79% | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1339 |
| LiveBench Language | 34.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Kimi K3?
Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Kimi K3 better for coding?
Kimi K3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 61.0 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Kimi K3 share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K3 has 53.