Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs MiMo-V2-Flash
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 2 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 59.9 to 49.8.
- MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 34.8 | 40.8 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2025-12-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 54 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.2 (#308), MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.8 (#205)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1351 | 1443 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.0 (#85), MiMo-V2-Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#308), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.1 (#155)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1420 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.1 (#127), MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.6 (#141)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1351 | 1396 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#207), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.1 (#126)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1340 | 1425 |
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 35.9 (#74), MiMo-V2-Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.6 (#144), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.1 (#109)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1391 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1463 |
| LMArena French | 1390 | 1429 |
| LMArena German | 1354 | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1293 | 1324 |
| LMArena Korean | 1314 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | 1420 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.6 (#91), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.7 (#115)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1392 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#198), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#106)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1409 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.8 (#184), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.9 (#101)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1404 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than MiMo-V2-Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 28.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and MiMo-V2-Flash share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.