Model comparison

Magistral Medium vs MiMo-V2-Flash

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Magistral Medium Mistral AI

34.8

Rank #224 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Flash Xiaomi

40.8

Rank #137 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Magistral Medium scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2-Flash in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 24.1 to 8.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 39.2% for Magistral Medium and 25.9% for MiMo-V2-Flash.
  • MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $5 for Magistral Medium.
  • MiMo-V2-Flash accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Magistral Medium and MiMo-V2-Flash specifications
Magistral MediumMiMo-V2-Flash
ProviderMistral AIXiaomi
Noometry Index34.840.8
Released2025-03-172025-12-16
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K262K
Max output16K66K
Input $ / M tokens$2$0.14
Output $ / M tokens$5$0.28
Results tracked2221

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Magistral Medium leads

Magistral Medium: 38.6 (#161), MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.8 (#205)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiMo-V2-Flash
SciCode39.2%25.9%
LMArena Coding13191443
LMArena WebDev—1330
ALE-Bench—737.95

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Magistral Medium: 8.7 (#342), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.1 (#155)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiMo-V2-Flash
CritPt0.3%0%
LMArena Hard Prompts12671420
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark16.2%—
ARC-AGI-16.1%—

Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Magistral Medium: 32.4 (#187), MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.6 (#141)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Math12491396

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Magistral Medium: 32.9 (#199), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.1 (#126)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Expert12221425

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Magistral Medium: 39.8 (#219), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.1 (#109)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Non-English12321391
LMArena Chinese12251463
LMArena French12681429
LMArena German12481395
LMArena Japanese11761324
LMArena Korean11251358
LMArena Russian12241387
LMArena Spanish12691420

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Magistral Medium: 66.2 (#207), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.7 (#115)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following12541392

Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#178), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#106)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Longer Query12951409

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Magistral Medium: 46.5 (#214), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.9 (#101)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Text12551411
LMArena Creative Writing12451375
LMArena Multi-Turn12751404

Frequently asked questions

Is Magistral Medium better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 34.8 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Magistral Medium or MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Magistral Medium lists at $2 and $5.

Is Magistral Medium or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

Magistral Medium scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Flash does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Magistral Medium and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Medium has 22 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper