Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Qwen Plus
Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen Plus in 4 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads 37.9 to 23.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 57.8% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 17.8% for Qwen Plus.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 37.1 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2024-01-25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 54 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen Plus leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315), Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | 1328 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92), Qwen Plus: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
Reasoning Qwen Plus leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318), Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | 63.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1317 |
| DTBench | 63.2% | 81.1% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146), Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | 17.8% |
| LMArena Math | 1352 | 1326 |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213), Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | 48.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1328 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79), Qwen Plus: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149), Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1323 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena German | 1353 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97), Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1303 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
Long Context Qwen Plus leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203), Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 1324 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
Writing & Preference Qwen Plus leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190), Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1336 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Qwen Plus?
Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Qwen Plus better for coding?
Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Qwen Plus share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.