Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Yi-Lightning
Yi-Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 4 categories and Yi-Lightning in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Yi-Lightning leads 25.9 to 15.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Aider Polyglot: 38.2% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 12.9% for Yi-Lightning.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Yi-Lightning | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | 01.AI | |
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 37.1 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2024-12-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 54 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315), Yi-Lightning: 27.4 (#320)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | 12.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | 1312 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92), Yi-Lightning: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
Reasoning Yi-Lightning leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318), Yi-Lightning: 25.9 (#139)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1302 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146), Yi-Lightning: 36.2 (#172)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1352 | 1300 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Yi-Lightning leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213), Yi-Lightning: 35.4 (#185)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1286 |
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79), Yi-Lightning: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149), Yi-Lightning: 42.2 (#196)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1269 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1320 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | 1305 |
| LMArena German | 1353 | 1267 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | 1228 |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1255 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | 1315 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97), Yi-Lightning: 67.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1278 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
Long Context Yi-Lightning leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203), Yi-Lightning: 39.4 (#181)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 1297 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190), Yi-Lightning: 50.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1302 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1280 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1311 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Yi-Lightning?
Yi-Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Yi-Lightning better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 28.4 versus 27.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Yi-Lightning share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Yi-Lightning has 18.