Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Gemini 2.0 Pro and Mistral Medium 3.5 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.6 vs 39.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Pro Google

38.6

Rank #171 Confirmed

Mistral Medium 3.5 Mistral AI

39.6

Rank #151 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 4 categories and Mistral Medium 3.5 in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Mistral Medium 3.5 leads 43.2 to 29.1.
  • Mistral Medium 3.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Pro and Mistral Medium 3.5 specifications
Gemini 2.0 ProMistral Medium 3.5
ProviderGoogleMistral AI
Noometry Index38.639.6
Released2025-02-05—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—210K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked1422

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182), Mistral Medium 3.5: 35.7 (#208)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMistral Medium 3.5
Aider Polyglot35.6%—
LMArena WebDev—1263
LiveBench Coding63.5%—
LMArena Coding—1461

Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194), Mistral Medium 3.5: 16.6 (#290)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMistral Medium 3.5
Epoch Capabilities Index135.06141.42
Kagi LLM Benchmark—41.4%
NYT Connections (extended)—12.9%
EnigmaEval0.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning60.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1436
LiveBench Data Analysis68%—
LiveBench65.1%—

Math Too close to call

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101), Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.4 (#113)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMistral Medium 3.5
LiveBench Math71%—
LMArena Math—1432
MATH Level 583.5%—

Knowledge Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156), Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.3 (#123)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMistral Medium 3.5
GPQA Diamond65.7%—
Confabulations18.4%—
LMArena Expert—1431

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 37.6 (#64)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Vision—1222

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 52.1 (#93)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Non-English—1405
LMArena Chinese—1443
LMArena French—1448
LMArena German—1453
LMArena Korean—1387
LMArena Russian—1396
LMArena Spanish—1406

Instruction Following Too close to call

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57), Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.7 (#87)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMistral Medium 3.5
LiveBench Instruction Following83.4%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1414

Long Context Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287), Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#101)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMistral Medium 3.5
Fiction.LiveBench41.7%—
LMArena Longer Query—1414

Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164), Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.6 (#113)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text—1421
LMArena Creative Writing—1372
EQ-Bench 4—993
LMArena Multi-Turn—1423
LiveBench Language44.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Mistral Medium 3.5?

Gemini 2.0 Pro and Mistral Medium 3.5 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.6 vs 39.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Mistral Medium 3.5 better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 35.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Mistral Medium 3.5 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper