Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Molmo 2 8b
Gemini 2.0 Pro and Molmo 2 8b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.1 vs 39.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 75.5 to 67.0.
- Molmo 2 8b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Molmo 2 8b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 39.1 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Molmo 2 8b: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
Reasoning Molmo 2 8b leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Molmo 2 8b: 25.6 (#146)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1287 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Molmo 2 8b: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Molmo 2 8b: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Molmo 2 8b: 30.2 (#112)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1081 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Molmo 2 8b: 42.7 (#190)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1276 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Molmo 2 8b: 67.0 (#201)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1270 |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Molmo 2 8b: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Molmo 2 8b: 49.4 (#191)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Molmo 2 8b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1288 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Molmo 2 8b?
Gemini 2.0 Pro and Molmo 2 8b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.1 vs 39.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Molmo 2 8b share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Molmo 2 8b has 5.