Model comparison

Molmo 2 8b vs Qwen3 32B

Molmo 2 8b and Qwen3 32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.1 vs 39.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3 32B Alibaba (Qwen)

39.2

Rank #172 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Molmo 2 8b scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 32B in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Molmo 2 8b leads 25.6 to 20.2.

Side by side

Molmo 2 8b and Qwen3 32B specifications
Molmo 2 8bQwen3 32B
ProviderAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.139.2
Released—2025-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.70
Output $ / M tokens—$2.80
Results tracked526

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Molmo 2 8b: —, Qwen3 32B: 37.7 (#190)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen3 32B
Aider Polyglot—40%
SciCode—35.4%
LMArena Coding—1358

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Molmo 2 8b: —, Qwen3 32B: 32.6 (#62)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen3 32B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—48.7%

Reasoning Molmo 2 8b leads

Molmo 2 8b: 25.6 (#146), Qwen3 32B: 20.2 (#241)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen3 32B
LMArena Hard Prompts12871334
Kagi LLM Benchmark—54.9%
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—5%
DTBench—67.5%
LMCA—17.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—138.51

Math Not comparable

Molmo 2 8b: —, Qwen3 32B: 39.7 (#99)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen3 32B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—66.9%
LMArena Math—1399

Knowledge Not comparable

Molmo 2 8b: —, Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#125)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen3 32B
GPQA Diamond—65.7%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.9%
LMArena Expert—1362

Multimodal Not comparable

Molmo 2 8b: 30.2 (#112), Qwen3 32B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen3 32B
LMArena Vision1081—

Multilingual Qwen3 32B leads

Molmo 2 8b: 42.7 (#190), Qwen3 32B: 45.6 (#167)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen3 32B
LMArena Non-English12761317
LMArena Chinese—1357
LMArena German—1341
LMArena Russian—1311

Instruction Following Qwen3 32B leads

Molmo 2 8b: 67.0 (#201), Qwen3 32B: 68.9 (#179)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen3 32B
LMArena Instruction Following12701305

Long Context Not comparable

Molmo 2 8b: —, Qwen3 32B: 43.8 (#87)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen3 32B
Fiction.LiveBench—74.2%
LMArena Longer Query—1327

Writing & Preference Qwen3 32B leads

Molmo 2 8b: 49.4 (#191), Qwen3 32B: 52.9 (#163)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen3 32B
LMArena Text12881340
LMArena Creative Writing—1297
LMArena Multi-Turn—1331

Frequently asked questions

Is Molmo 2 8b better than Qwen3 32B?

Molmo 2 8b and Qwen3 32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.1 vs 39.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

How many benchmarks do Molmo 2 8b and Qwen3 32B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Molmo 2 8b has 5 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 32B has 26.

Related comparisons

Go deeper