Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Pro Google

39.1

Rank #173 Confirmed

Qwen3.8 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

56.8

Rank #22 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 Max in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.8 Max leads 73.2 to 39.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 92.7% for Qwen3.8 Max.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 ProQwen3.8 Max
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.156.8
Released2025-02-052026-08-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1439

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.8 Max leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Qwen3.8 Max: 53.5 (#29)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProQwen3.8 Max
DeepSWE—57.5%
Aider Polyglot35.6%—
LMArena WebDev—1674
FrontierSWE—17.8%
SciCode—53.2%
LiveBench Coding63.5%—
LMArena Coding—1502

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.4 (#14)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProQwen3.8 Max
APEX-Agents—63.3%
τ²-bench Banking—55.1%
GDP.pdf—23.2%

Reasoning Qwen3.8 Max leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Qwen3.8 Max: 54.4 (#26)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProQwen3.8 Max
Epoch Capabilities Index135.06156.41
NYT Connections (extended)—88.3%
CritPt—20%
Chess Puzzles—40%
EnigmaEval0.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning60.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1496
Mystery Game Puzzles—38%
DTBench—92%
LiveBench Data Analysis68%—
LMCA—46.2%
LiveBench65.1%—

Math Qwen3.8 Max leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Qwen3.8 Max: 73.2 (#20)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProQwen3.8 Max
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4—46.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—100%
ProofBench—58%
LiveBench Math71%—
LMArena Math—1499
MATH Level 583.5%—

Knowledge Qwen3.8 Max leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#27)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProQwen3.8 Max
GPQA Diamond65.7%92.7%
SimpleQA Verified—47.3%
Confabulations18.4%—
LMArena Expert—1507

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 37.2 (#75)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Vision—1314
Furniture Assembly—20%

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 56.7 (#18)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Non-English—1472
LMArena Chinese—1538
LMArena French—1503
LMArena German—1483
LMArena Japanese—1467
LMArena Korean—1461
LMArena Russian—1481
LMArena Spanish—1492

Instruction Following Qwen3.8 Max leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Qwen3.8 Max: 77.6 (#17)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProQwen3.8 Max
LiveBench Instruction Following83.4%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1479

Long Context Qwen3.8 Max leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Qwen3.8 Max: 45.6 (#31)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProQwen3.8 Max
Fiction.LiveBench41.7%—
LMArena Longer Query—1489

Writing & Preference Qwen3.8 Max leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Qwen3.8 Max: 67.1 (#30)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Text—1483
LMArena Creative Writing—1479
LMArena Multi-Turn—1489
LiveBench Language44.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.8 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.5 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Qwen3.8 Max share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Max has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper