Model comparison

Molmo 2 8b vs Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.8 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

56.8

Rank #22 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Molmo 2 8b scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 Max in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.8 Max leads 54.4 to 25.6.
  • Molmo 2 8b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Molmo 2 8b and Qwen3.8 Max specifications
Molmo 2 8bQwen3.8 Max
ProviderAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.156.8
Released—2026-08-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked539

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Molmo 2 8b: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 53.5 (#29)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen3.8 Max
DeepSWE—57.5%
LMArena WebDev—1674
FrontierSWE—17.8%
SciCode—53.2%
LMArena Coding—1502

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Molmo 2 8b: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.4 (#14)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen3.8 Max
APEX-Agents—63.3%
τ²-bench Banking—55.1%
GDP.pdf—23.2%

Reasoning Qwen3.8 Max leads

Molmo 2 8b: 25.6 (#146), Qwen3.8 Max: 54.4 (#26)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts12871496
NYT Connections (extended)—88.3%
CritPt—20%
Chess Puzzles—40%
Mystery Game Puzzles—38%
DTBench—92%
LMCA—46.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.41

Math Not comparable

Molmo 2 8b: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 73.2 (#20)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen3.8 Max
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4—46.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—100%
ProofBench—58%
LMArena Math—1499

Knowledge Not comparable

Molmo 2 8b: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#27)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen3.8 Max
GPQA Diamond—92.7%
SimpleQA Verified—47.3%
LMArena Expert—1507

Multimodal Qwen3.8 Max leads

Molmo 2 8b: 30.2 (#112), Qwen3.8 Max: 37.2 (#75)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Vision10811314
Furniture Assembly—20%

Multilingual Qwen3.8 Max leads

Molmo 2 8b: 42.7 (#190), Qwen3.8 Max: 56.7 (#18)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Non-English12761472
LMArena Chinese—1538
LMArena French—1503
LMArena German—1483
LMArena Japanese—1467
LMArena Korean—1461
LMArena Russian—1481
LMArena Spanish—1492

Instruction Following Qwen3.8 Max leads

Molmo 2 8b: 67.0 (#201), Qwen3.8 Max: 77.6 (#17)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Instruction Following12701479

Long Context Not comparable

Molmo 2 8b: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.6 (#31)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Longer Query—1489

Writing & Preference Qwen3.8 Max leads

Molmo 2 8b: 49.4 (#191), Qwen3.8 Max: 67.1 (#30)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMolmo 2 8bQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Text12881483
LMArena Creative Writing—1479
LMArena Multi-Turn—1489

Frequently asked questions

Is Molmo 2 8b better than Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Molmo 2 8b and Qwen3.8 Max share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Molmo 2 8b has 5 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Max has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper