Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Yi-34B
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Yi-34B in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 36.5 to 7.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 83.5% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 5.1% for Yi-34B.
- Yi-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | 01.AI | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 27.8 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2023-11-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1112 |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 117.39 |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1104 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 71.7% |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | 5.1% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1114 |
| GSM8K | — | 76% |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 14.7% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1061 |
| MMLU | — | 76.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1079 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1176 |
| LMArena French | — | 1081 |
| LMArena German | — | 1042 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 993 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 959 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1050 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1070 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1091 |
Long Context Yi-34B leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1094 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1129 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1108 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1113 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Yi-34B?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Yi-34B better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Yi-34B share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.