Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multimodal, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 40.2 to 28.6.
- Both cost about the same: $0.10 input and $0.40 output per million tokens.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 36.4 | 44.4 |
| Released | 2025-06-17 | 2026-09-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Max output | 66K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 33 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#167), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1373 | 1516 |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 325.9 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 27.8 (#89), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 36.9% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 21.5 (#196), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1377 | 1481 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.5% | — |
| DTBench | 62.8% | — |
| LMCA | 18.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.93 | — |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 35.5 (#144), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1373 | 1477 |
| Omni-MATH | 48% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.1 (#206), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1373 | 1516 |
| MMLU-Pro | 53.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 3.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.9% | — |
Multimodal MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.6 (#109), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1198 | 1266 |
| VPCT | 30% | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.5 (#129), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1369 | 1439 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | 1501 |
| LMArena Russian | 1373 | 1424 |
| LMArena French | 1388 | — |
| LMArena German | 1390 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1359 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1396 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.2 (#163), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1366 | 1463 |
| IFEval | 81% | — |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#257), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | 1465 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 47.2% | — |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 57.0 (#130), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1379 | 1459 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1366 | 1408 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1367 | 1460 |
| WildBench | 81.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite lists at $0.10 and $0.40.
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 1.05M tokens.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13.