Model comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Step 3.7 Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
StepFunSummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 29.6 to 20.9.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.18 / $1.11 for Step 3.7 Flash.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Step 3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 44.4 | 36.5 |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2026-05-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 256K |
| Max output | 131K | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | $0.18 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | $1.11 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68), Step 3.7 Flash: 39.4 (#147)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 40% |
| LMArena Coding | 1516 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 694.12 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82), Step 3.7 Flash: 20.9 (#211)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 39.7% |
| CritPt | — | 2.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | — |
Math Step 3.7 Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97), Step 3.7 Flash: 40.9 (#74)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 68.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1477 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1516 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1266 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1439 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1501 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1424 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1463 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1465 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1460 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than Step 3.7 Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Step 3.7 Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Step 3.7 Flash lists at $0.18 and $1.11.
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 39.4 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Step 3.7 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.