Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemma 3n E4b IT
Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher in 7 categories and Gemma 3n E4b IT in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 2.5 Pro leads 56.0 to 34.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 70.3% for Gemini 2.5 Pro and 31.5% for Gemma 3n E4b IT.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 45.0 | 37.3 |
| Released | 2025-03-25 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.25 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 78 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 42.4 (#101), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1452 | 1268 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 57.6% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 53.6% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 83.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1227 | — |
| SciCode | 42.8% | — |
| GSO | 3.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 54% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 85.9% | — |
| CadEval | 64% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.52 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.51 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 29.2 (#88), Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 32.6% | — |
| GDPval | 23.3% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 0.8% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 30.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 13.7% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 42.8% | — |
| BALROG | 43.3% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1142 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 55.4% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 573.64 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 28.8 (#99), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 70.3% | 31.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1455 | 1284 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 62.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 41% | — |
| CritPt | 2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 5.6% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 89.8% | — |
| DTBench | 82.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 79.9% | — |
| LMCA | 34.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.32 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.3 | — |
| LiveBench | 82.3% | — |
Math Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 32.5 (#213), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1450 | 1251 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 24.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 84.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 41.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 90.2% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 95.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 14.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 56.0 (#46), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1452 | 1246 |
| GPQA Diamond | 85.3% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 21.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 86.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 10.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 74.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 45.2 (#18), Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1263 | — |
| GeoBench | 86% | — |
| VPCT | 48% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1421 | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 44.7% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.3 (#31), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1451 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1309 |
| LMArena French | 1472 | 1330 |
| LMArena German | 1487 | 1311 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1461 | 1272 |
| LMArena Korean | 1434 | 1259 |
| LMArena Russian | 1461 | 1288 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1305 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 75.0 (#75), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1437 | 1255 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 80.6% | — |
| IFEval | 84% | — |
Long Context Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 59.8 (#5), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1449 | 1276 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 91.7% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 63.7 (#62), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1458 | 1306 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1454 | 1287 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1453 | 1276 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 83.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1421 | — |
| WildBench | 85.7% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 67.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro better than Gemma 3n E4b IT?
Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro or Gemma 3n E4b IT better for coding?
Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Pro and Gemma 3n E4b IT share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Pro has 78 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18.