Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 65.3 to 50.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 45.2 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1503 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1479 |
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 899.8 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1488 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 34.4% |
| CritPt | — | 4% |
| DTBench | — | 84.5% |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |
Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1481 |
| ProofBench | — | 22% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1503 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1449 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1507 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1488 |
| LMArena German | 1311 | 1458 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | 1412 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 1437 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1450 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1471 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1477 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1483 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1465 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1440 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1477 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1493 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1208 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.