Model comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs GLM-4.6
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GLM-4.6 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.5 vs 41.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 22 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 7 categories and GLM-4.6 in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GLM-4.6 leads 39.1 to 25.9.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper at $0.30 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $2.20 for GLM-4.6.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 205K.
- GLM-4.6 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 41.4 |
| Released | 2026-07-21 | 2025-09-30 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 205K |
| Max output | 66K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | $0.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $2.20 |
| Results tracked | 39 | 29 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104), GLM-4.6: 40.1 (#148)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | 1340 |
| SciCode | 41.3% | 38.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | 1449 |
| ALE-Bench | 765.27 | 340.82 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 55.4% |
| WeirdML | 39% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use GLM-4.6 leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107), GLM-4.6: 32.3 (#66)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 24.5% |
| APEX-Agents | 29.3% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 72.4% |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114), GLM-4.6: 23.7 (#172)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 1.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1441 | 1440 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 47.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 53.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | — |
| DTBench | 83.5% | — |
| LMCA | 37.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.13 | — |
Math GLM-4.6 leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264), GLM-4.6: 39.1 (#111)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1433 | 1432 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | — |
| ProofBench | 13% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 3.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72), GLM-4.6: 40.2 (#124)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1435 | 1431 |
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.5% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40), GLM-4.6: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1268 | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63), GLM-4.6: 53.5 (#66)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1427 | 1426 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | 1499 |
| LMArena French | 1451 | 1459 |
| LMArena German | 1454 | 1447 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1427 | 1393 |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | 1400 |
| LMArena Russian | 1443 | 1419 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1442 | 1436 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85), GLM-4.6: 74.3 (#98)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1410 |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84), GLM-4.6: 43.4 (#94)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1422 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57), GLM-4.6: 61.1 (#90)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1435 | 1440 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1420 | 1411 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | 1411 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1427 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than GLM-4.6?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GLM-4.6 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.5 vs 41.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or GLM-4.6?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; GLM-4.6 lists at $0.60 and $2.20.
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or GLM-4.6 better for coding?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 205K.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GLM-4.6 share?
22 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.6 has 29.