Model comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs GLM-5V-Turbo
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs 2.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-5V-Turbo's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 5 categories and GLM-5V-Turbo in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 39.4 to 25.9.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper at $0.30 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens, against $1.20 / $4 for GLM-5V-Turbo.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 200K.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-5V-Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 43.8 |
| Released | 2026-07-21 | 2026-04-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 200K |
| Max output | 66K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | $1.20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $4 |
| Results tracked | 39 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104), GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | 1401 |
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | 1466 |
| SciCode | 41.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 39% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 765.27 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107), GLM-5V-Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 29.3% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |
Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114), GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1441 | 1443 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 53.5% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | — |
| DTBench | 83.5% | — |
| LMCA | 37.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.13 | — |
Math GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264), GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1433 | 1441 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | — |
| ProofBench | 13% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72), GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1435 | 1452 |
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | — |
Multimodal Too close to call
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40), GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1268 | 1264 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1416 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63), GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1427 | 1420 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | 1488 |
| LMArena French | 1451 | 1444 |
| LMArena German | 1454 | 1423 |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | 1396 |
| LMArena Russian | 1443 | 1431 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1442 | 1450 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1427 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85), GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1423 |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84), GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1438 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57), GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1435 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1420 | 1416 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1432 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than GLM-5V-Turbo?
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs 2.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-5V-Turbo's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or GLM-5V-Turbo?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; GLM-5V-Turbo lists at $1.20 and $4.
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or GLM-5V-Turbo better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (42.4 vs 42.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GLM-5V-Turbo share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5V-Turbo has 19.