Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-5.2 Pro

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 52.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #11 Confirmed

GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI

52.2

Rank #34 Reported

Summary

  • They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 2 categories and GPT-5.2 Pro in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 70.1 to 51.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-2: 84.6% for Gemini 3.7 Flash and 54.2% for GPT-5.2 Pro.
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.75 / $3.75 per million input/output tokens, against $21 / $168 for GPT-5.2 Pro.
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 400K.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 FlashGPT-5.2 Pro
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Noometry Index59.852.2
Released2026-08-132025-12-11
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M400K
Max output66K128K
Input $ / M tokens$0.75$21
Output $ / M tokens$3.75$168
Results tracked448

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 55.7 (#19), GPT-5.2 Pro: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGPT-5.2 Pro
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
LMArena WebDev1593—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
SciCode59.8%—
LMArena Coding1499—
ALE-Bench904.3—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.2 (#18), GPT-5.2 Pro: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGPT-5.2 Pro
APEX-Agents67.8%—
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.1 (#12), GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.8 (#31)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGPT-5.2 Pro
ARC-AGI-284.6%54.2%
NYT Connections (extended)94%79.3%
ARC-AGI-195.5%90.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index157.72155.41
SimpleBench—57.4%
CritPt14.3%—
Chess Puzzles47%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1497—
Mystery Game Puzzles37%—
DTBench96.8%—
LMCA50.4%—

Math Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.5 (#18), GPT-5.2 Pro: 64.8 (#23)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGPT-5.2 Pro
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%74%
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%46%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%—
ProofBench58%—
LMArena Math1511—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—31.3%

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.8 (#4), GPT-5.2 Pro: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGPT-5.2 Pro
GPQA Diamond94.8%—
SimpleQA Verified69.2%—
LMArena Expert1508—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 36.9 (#69), GPT-5.2 Pro: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGPT-5.2 Pro
LMArena Vision1314—
Furniture Assembly26.7%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.8 (#7), GPT-5.2 Pro: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGPT-5.2 Pro
LMArena Non-English1485—
LMArena Chinese1553—
LMArena French1512—
LMArena German1485—
LMArena Japanese1506—
LMArena Korean1486—
LMArena Russian1519—
LMArena Spanish1507—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 78.0 (#12), GPT-5.2 Pro: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGPT-5.2 Pro
LMArena Instruction Following1486—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.8 (#28), GPT-5.2 Pro: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGPT-5.2 Pro
LMArena Longer Query1493—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.4 (#19), GPT-5.2 Pro: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashGPT-5.2 Pro
LMArena Text1487—
LMArena Creative Writing1490—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1723—
LMArena Multi-Turn1495—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than GPT-5.2 Pro?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 52.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or GPT-5.2 Pro?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.75 per million input tokens and $3.75 per million output tokens; GPT-5.2 Pro lists at $21 and $168.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.7 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 400K.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and GPT-5.2 Pro share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.2 Pro has 8.

Related comparisons

Go deeper