Model comparison
GPT-5.2 Pro vs Kimi K3
Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 52.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K3 in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K3 leads 63.0 to 51.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 79.3% for GPT-5.2 Pro and 93.6% for Kimi K3.
- Kimi K3 is cheaper at $3 / $15 per million input/output tokens, against $21 / $168 for GPT-5.2 Pro.
- Kimi K3 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 400K.
- Kimi K3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.2 Pro | Kimi K3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 52.3 | 59.5 |
| Released | 2025-12-11 | 2026-07-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 400K | 1.05M |
| Max output | 128K | 1.05M |
| Input $ / M tokens | $21 | $3 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $168 | $15 |
| Results tracked | 8 | 53 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Kimi K3: 61.0 (#10)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 68.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 44.2% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1654 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 25.9% |
| SciCode | — | 59.5% |
| WeirdML | — | 82.6% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1508 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,524 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Kimi K3: 41.8 (#20)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 50.6% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 37.1% |
| PostTrainBench | — | 32% |
| GBAEval | — | 48.3% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 19% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,165 |
Reasoning Kimi K3 leads
GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.5 (#33), Kimi K3: 63.0 (#17)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 54.2% | 60.4% |
| SimpleBench | 57.4% | 60.7% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.3% | 93.6% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | 94.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.4 | 157.45 |
| CritPt | — | 23.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 39% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1496 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 26% |
| DTBench | — | 91.2% |
| LMCA | — | 52.7% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 95% |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.1 |
Math Kimi K3 leads
GPT-5.2 Pro: 65.3 (#29), Kimi K3: 74.2 (#16)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74% | 72.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46% | 39% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 87.8% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 97.2% |
| ProofBench | — | 87% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1491 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 31.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Kimi K3: 63.2 (#21)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 93.1% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 50.6% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1521 |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Kimi K3: 37.8 (#70)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 29.5% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 34.2% |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Kimi K3: 56.3 (#21)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1466 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1529 |
| LMArena French | — | 1491 |
| LMArena German | — | 1488 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1487 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1458 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1482 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1472 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Kimi K3: 77.7 (#14)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1483 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Kimi K3: 45.8 (#29)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1494 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Kimi K3: 76.6 (#4)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1476 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1454 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2082 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1488 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than Kimi K3?
Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 52.3 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 Pro or Kimi K3?
Kimi K3 is cheaper. It lists at $3 per million input tokens and $15 per million output tokens; GPT-5.2 Pro lists at $21 and $168.
Which has the bigger context window?
Kimi K3 does, with 1.05M tokens against 400K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and Kimi K3 share?
7 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K3 has 53.