Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #14 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #71 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 70.0 to 30.8.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.5 Max Preview
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index59.845.3
Released2026-08-13—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.75—
Output $ / M tokens$3.75—
Results tracked4417

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 56.2 (#22), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Coding14971487
DeepSWE65.5%—
FrontierCode43.6%—
LMArena WebDev1592—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
SciCode59.8%—
ALE-Bench904.3—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.1 (#19), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.5 Max Preview
APEX-Agents67.8%—
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.0 (#15), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts14941483
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)94%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
CritPt14.3%—
Chess Puzzles47%—
Mystery Game Puzzles37%—
DTBench96.8%—
LMCA50.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index157.27—

Math Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.6 (#23), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Math15071474
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%—
ProofBench58%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.7 (#5), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Expert15081489
GPQA Diamond94.8%—
SimpleQA Verified69.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#73), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Vision1316—
Furniture Assembly26.7%—

Multilingual Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.6 (#7), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Non-English14841465
LMArena Chinese15481534
LMArena French15051484
LMArena German14981487
LMArena Japanese15121495
LMArena Korean14831438
LMArena Russian15161471
LMArena Spanish15031470

Instruction Following Too close to call

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 77.7 (#15), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Instruction Following14831467

Long Context Too close to call

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.7 (#30), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Longer Query14921476

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.2 (#20), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)

BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Text14861470
LMArena Creative Writing14901464
LMArena Multi-Turn14891478
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1723—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.2 versus 44.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper