Model comparison

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Plus costs 2.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.7 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 30 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.7 Flash Google

59.8

Rank #14 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #72 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 30 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher in 9 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 1 category; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.7 Flash leads 70.0 to 39.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 71.6% for Gemini 3.7 Flash and 34.4% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
  • Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.75 / $3.75 for Gemini 3.7 Flash.
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.

Side by side

Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen3.7 Plus specifications
Gemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.7 Plus
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index59.845.3
Released2026-08-132026-06-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M1M
Max output66K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.75$0.40
Output $ / M tokens$3.75$1.60
Results tracked4432

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 56.2 (#22), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.7 Plus
FrontierCode43.6%10.2%
SciCode59.8%45.5%
LMArena Coding14971473
DeepSWE65.5%—
LMArena WebDev1592—
FrontierSWE20.3%—
ALE-Bench904.3—

Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.1 (#19), Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.7 Plus
APEX-Agents67.8%—
OSWorld 2.0—2.8%
Remote Labor Index5%—
GDP.pdf23.8%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.0 (#15), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.7 Plus
NYT Connections (extended)94%74.8%
CritPt14.3%9.1%
Chess Puzzles47%24%
LMArena Hard Prompts14941460
Mystery Game Puzzles37%17%
DTBench96.8%84%
LMCA50.4%37.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index157.27147.37
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—

Math Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.6 (#23), Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.7 Plus
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)71.6%34.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%93.3%
LMArena Math15071466
FrontierMath Tier 436.6%—
ProofBench58%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.7 (#5), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.7 Plus
GPQA Diamond94.8%87.9%
LMArena Expert15081467
SimpleQA Verified69.2%—

Multimodal Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#73), Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision13161279
Furniture Assembly26.7%—
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.6 (#7), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Non-English14841445
LMArena Chinese15481510
LMArena French15051473
LMArena German14981471
LMArena Japanese15121413
LMArena Korean14831415
LMArena Russian15161457
LMArena Spanish15031457

Instruction Following Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 77.7 (#15), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following14831440

Long Context Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.7 (#30), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Longer Query14921455

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.7 Flash leads

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.2 (#20), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text14861455
LMArena Creative Writing14901439
LMArena Multi-Turn14891460
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1723—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.8 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Plus costs 2.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.7 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.7 Flash lists at $0.75 and $3.75.

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.2 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.7 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.7 Flash and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

30 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper