Model comparison
Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs GPT-5 Nano
Gemini 3 Flash Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 33.5 on the Noometry Index. GPT-5 Nano costs 8.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3 Flash Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 39 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 39 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3 Flash Preview scores higher in 10 categories and GPT-5 Nano in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads 49.2 to 16.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-1: 84.7% for Gemini 3 Flash Preview and 20.7% for GPT-5 Nano.
- GPT-5 Nano is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $3 for Gemini 3 Flash Preview.
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 400K.
Side by side
| Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GPT-5 Nano | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 52.3 | 33.5 |
| Released | 2025-12-17 | 2025-08-07 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 400K |
| Max output | 66K | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3 | $0.40 |
| Results tracked | 59 | 49 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 50.9 (#42), GPT-5 Nano: 33.6 (#254)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 75.8% | 34.8% |
| WeirdML | 61.6% | 38.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1460 | 1351 |
| ALE-Bench | 1,367 | 718.67 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 75.4% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1439 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 72.7% | — |
| GSO | 9.8% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 38.7 (#29), GPT-5 Nano: 25.8 (#106)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 64.3% | 21.8% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 51.5% |
| τ²-bench Airline | 82.5% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 27.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Retail | 76.8% | — |
| τ²-bench Telecom | 91.2% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 49.8% | — |
| BALROG | 48.1% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1198 | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 3,635 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 49.2 (#37), GPT-5 Nano: 16.3 (#306)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 33.6% | 2.6% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 84.7% | 20.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | 40% | 27% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1465 | 1328 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 26% | 9% |
| DTBench | 89.1% | 62.7% |
| LMCA | 43.1% | 7.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 151.8 | 139.38 |
| ForecastBench | 58.5 | 59.1 |
| SimpleBench | 61.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 62.2% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 83.1% | — |
Math Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 51.7 (#55), GPT-5 Nano: 29.4 (#241)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 51.2% | 20% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 17.1% | 2.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | 81.1% |
| ProofBench | 15% | 12% |
| LMArena Math | 1473 | 1317 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 35.6% | 8.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | 2.1% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 67.6% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 54.6% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 95.2% |
Knowledge Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 58.8 (#33), GPT-5 Nano: 35.9 (#178)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.4% | 69.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 66.8% | 11.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 13.5% | 10.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1462 | 1321 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 77.8% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 67.9% |
Multimodal Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 45.5 (#16), GPT-5 Nano: 31.3 (#108)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1285 | 1159 |
| VPCT | 72.6% | 37.2% |
| GeoBench | 88% | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 0% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1413 | — |
Multilingual Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 55.7 (#27), GPT-5 Nano: 45.3 (#172)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1458 | 1313 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1511 | 1356 |
| LMArena German | 1497 | 1327 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1489 | 1226 |
| LMArena Korean | 1443 | 1269 |
| LMArena Russian | 1480 | 1296 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1469 | 1360 |
| LMArena French | 1477 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 75.7 (#56), GPT-5 Nano: 75.0 (#79)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1437 | 1306 |
| IFEval | — | 93.2% |
Long Context Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 44.4 (#67), GPT-5 Nano: 31.3 (#281)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1452 | 1312 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 44.4% |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 65.5 (#45), GPT-5 Nano: 39.1 (#249)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1466 | 1320 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1457 | 1249 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1311 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 705 |
| WildBench | — | 80.6% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3 Flash Preview better than GPT-5 Nano?
Gemini 3 Flash Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 33.5 on the Noometry Index. GPT-5 Nano costs 8.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3 Flash Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3 Flash Preview or GPT-5 Nano?
GPT-5 Nano is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Gemini 3 Flash Preview lists at $0.50 and $3.
Is Gemini 3 Flash Preview or GPT-5 Nano better for coding?
Gemini 3 Flash Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.9 versus 33.6 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3 Flash Preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 400K.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3 Flash Preview and GPT-5 Nano share?
39 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3 Flash Preview has 59 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5 Nano has 49.