Model comparison
Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Gemini 3 Flash Preview and Qwen3.6 Max Preview score almost the same on the Noometry Index (52.3 vs 51.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 29 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 29 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3 Flash Preview scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen3.6 Max Preview in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads 49.2 to 41.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 40% for Gemini 3 Flash Preview and 20% for Qwen3.6 Max Preview.
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview is cheaper at $0.50 / $3 per million input/output tokens, against $1.30 / $7.80 for Qwen3.6 Max Preview.
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
Side by side
| Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Qwen3.6 Max Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 52.3 | 51.5 |
| Released | 2025-12-17 | 2026-04-20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 262K |
| Max output | 66K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | $1.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3 | $7.80 |
| Results tracked | 59 | 29 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 50.9 (#42), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.7 (#54)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 75.4% | 76.7% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1439 | 1482 |
| LMArena Coding | 1460 | 1471 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 75.8% | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 72.7% | — |
| GSO | 9.8% | — |
| WeirdML | 61.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,367 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 38.7 (#29), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | 3,635 | 4,254 |
| Terminal-Bench | 64.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Airline | 82.5% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 27.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Retail | 76.8% | — |
| τ²-bench Telecom | 91.2% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 49.8% | — |
| BALROG | 48.1% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1198 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 49.2 (#37), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 41.7 (#53)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 61.1% | 63% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 83.1% | 74.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | 40% | 20% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1465 | 1457 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 26% | 19% |
| DTBench | 89.1% | 87.2% |
| LMCA | 43.1% | 42.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 151.8 | 149.24 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 33.6% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 84.7% | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.5 | — |
Math Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 51.7 (#55), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.1 (#46)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | 91.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1473 | 1465 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 35.6% | 23.1% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | 4.2% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 51.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 17.1% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 67.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 15% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 58.8 (#33), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#39)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.4% | 87.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 66.8% | 52% |
| LMArena Expert | 1462 | 1478 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 13.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 45.5 (#16), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1285 | — |
| GeoBench | 88% | — |
| VPCT | 72.6% | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 0% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1413 | — |
Multilingual Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 55.7 (#27), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.2 (#48)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1458 | 1437 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1511 | 1487 |
| LMArena French | 1477 | 1449 |
| LMArena Russian | 1480 | 1445 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1469 | 1454 |
| LMArena German | 1497 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1489 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1443 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 75.7 (#56), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.7 (#55)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1437 | 1438 |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 44.4 (#67), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#61)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1452 | 1457 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 65.5 (#45), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 63.8 (#60)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1466 | 1447 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1457 | 1435 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1456 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3 Flash Preview better than Qwen3.6 Max Preview?
Gemini 3 Flash Preview and Qwen3.6 Max Preview score almost the same on the Noometry Index (52.3 vs 51.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3 Flash Preview or Qwen3.6 Max Preview?
Gemini 3 Flash Preview is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $3 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 Max Preview lists at $1.30 and $7.80.
Is Gemini 3 Flash Preview or Qwen3.6 Max Preview better for coding?
Gemini 3 Flash Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.9 versus 48.7 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3 Flash Preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3 Flash Preview and Qwen3.6 Max Preview share?
29 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3 Flash Preview has 59 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29.