Model comparison
Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs Qwen3.7 Max
Gemini 3 Flash Preview and Qwen3.7 Max score almost the same on the Noometry Index (52.3 vs 51.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 28 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 28 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3 Flash Preview scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads 38.7 to 22.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 40% for Gemini 3 Flash Preview and 19% for Qwen3.7 Max.
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview is cheaper at $0.50 / $3 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3.7 Max.
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
Side by side
| Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Qwen3.7 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 52.3 | 51.5 |
| Released | 2025-12-17 | 2026-05-19 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Max output | 66K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | $2.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3 | $7.50 |
| Results tracked | 59 | 33 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 50.9 (#42), Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 75.4% | 77.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1439 | 1515 |
| LMArena Coding | 1460 | 1498 |
| ALE-Bench | 1,367 | 1,189 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 75.8% | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 72.7% | — |
| SciCode | — | 48.8% |
| GSO | 9.8% | — |
| WeirdML | 61.6% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 38.7 (#29), Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 64.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Airline | 82.5% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 27.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Retail | 76.8% | — |
| τ²-bench Telecom | 91.2% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 49.8% | — |
| BALROG | 48.1% | — |
| GBAEval | — | 0.4% |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1198 | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 3,635 | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 49.2 (#37), Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 61.1% | 70.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 83.1% | 85.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | 40% | 19% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1465 | 1483 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 26% | 32% |
| DTBench | 89.1% | 92.3% |
| LMCA | 43.1% | 44% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 151.8 | 153.68 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 33.6% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 84.7% | — |
| CritPt | — | 13.4% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 9.5% |
| ForecastBench | 58.5 | — |
Math Qwen3.7 Max leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 51.7 (#55), Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 51.2% | 64.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 17.1% | 34.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | 95.6% |
| ProofBench | 15% | 26% |
| LMArena Math | 1473 | 1490 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 67.6% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 35.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Max leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 58.8 (#33), Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.4% | 90.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 66.8% | 55.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1462 | 1488 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 13.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 45.5 (#16), Qwen3.7 Max: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1285 | — |
| GeoBench | 88% | — |
| VPCT | 72.6% | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 0% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1413 | — |
Multilingual Qwen3.7 Max leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 55.7 (#27), Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1458 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1511 | 1530 |
| LMArena Russian | 1480 | 1484 |
| LMArena French | 1477 | — |
| LMArena German | 1497 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1489 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1443 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1469 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Max leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 75.7 (#56), Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1437 | 1460 |
Long Context Qwen3.7 Max leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 44.4 (#67), Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1452 | 1482 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 65.5 (#45), Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1466 | 1476 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1457 | 1449 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1481 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1110 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3 Flash Preview better than Qwen3.7 Max?
Gemini 3 Flash Preview and Qwen3.7 Max score almost the same on the Noometry Index (52.3 vs 51.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3 Flash Preview or Qwen3.7 Max?
Gemini 3 Flash Preview is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $3 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Max lists at $2.50 and $7.50.
Is Gemini 3 Flash Preview or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (50.9 vs 50.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3 Flash Preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3 Flash Preview and Qwen3.7 Max share?
28 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3 Flash Preview has 59 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.