Model comparison

Gemini 4 Argon vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 4 Argon Google

56.5

Rank #24 Confirmed

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview Amazon

33.4

Rank #244 Reported

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 3 categories and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 49.2 to 21.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 27.1% for Gemini 4 Argon and 0% for Nova 2.0 Pro Preview.

Side by side

Gemini 4 Argon and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview specifications
Gemini 4 ArgonNova 2.0 Pro Preview
ProviderGoogleAmazon
Noometry Index56.533.4
Released2026-09-302025-12-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked213

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonNova 2.0 Pro Preview
SciCode61.8%42.7%
LMArena WebDev1678—
FrontierSWE55%—
LMArena Coding1550—

Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonNova 2.0 Pro Preview
APEX-Agents82.2%—
GDP.pdf—2%
Vending-Bench 213,718—

Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonNova 2.0 Pro Preview
CritPt27.1%0%
LMArena Hard Prompts1548—

Math Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonNova 2.0 Pro Preview
ProofBench99%—
LMArena Math1536—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Expert1553—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonNova 2.0 Pro Preview
Blueprint-Bench 254.4%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Non-English1523—
LMArena Chinese1610—
LMArena Russian1537—
LMArena Spanish1497—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Instruction Following1538—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Longer Query1549—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Text1534—
LMArena Creative Writing1531—
LMArena Multi-Turn1557—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview?

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 4 Argon or Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better for coding?

Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 40.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper