Model comparison
Gemini 4 Argon vs Qwen2.5-Max
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 40.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5-Max in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 36.9.
Side by side
| Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen2.5-Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 40.7 |
| Released | 2026-09-30 | 2025-01-25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), Qwen2.5-Max: 41.8 (#117)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | 1359 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| SciCode | 61.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 64.4% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), Qwen2.5-Max: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), Qwen2.5-Max: 25.6 (#147)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | 1360 |
| CritPt | 27.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 51.4% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 67.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 132.53 |
| LiveBench | — | 62.3% |
Math Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), Qwen2.5-Max: 36.9 (#162)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1536 | 1369 |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 58.4% |
Knowledge Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), Qwen2.5-Max: 35.3 (#186)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | 1337 |
| Confabulations | — | 21.8% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), Qwen2.5-Max: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), Qwen2.5-Max: 48.1 (#146)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | 1352 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | 1353 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | 1377 |
| LMArena French | — | 1396 |
| LMArena German | — | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1300 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1304 |
Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), Qwen2.5-Max: 71.3 (#152)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | 1335 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 75.3% |
Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), Qwen2.5-Max: 41.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | 1358 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), Qwen2.5-Max: 55.4 (#146)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | 1367 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | 1364 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 72.9% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 56.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Qwen2.5-Max?
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 40.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 4 Argon or Qwen2.5-Max better for coding?
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen2.5-Max share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Max has 27.