Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini Advanced 0514 vs Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemini Advanced 0514 Google

37.7

Rank #197 Confirmed

Qwen3.8 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

56.8

Rank #22 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 Max in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.8 Max leads 73.2 to 35.5.

Side by side

Gemini Advanced 0514Qwen3.8 Max
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.756.8
Released—2026-08-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1739

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.8 Max leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.6 (#205), Qwen3.8 Max: 53.5 (#29)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Coding12551502
DeepSWE—57.5%
LMArena WebDev—1674
FrontierSWE—17.8%
SciCode—53.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini Advanced 0514: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.4 (#14)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Qwen3.8 Max
APEX-Agents—63.3%
τ²-bench Banking—55.1%
GDP.pdf—23.2%

Reasoning Qwen3.8 Max leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 24.6 (#160), Qwen3.8 Max: 54.4 (#26)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts12481496
NYT Connections (extended)—88.3%
CritPt—20%
Chess Puzzles—40%
Mystery Game Puzzles—38%
DTBench—92%
LMCA—46.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.41

Math Qwen3.8 Max leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 35.5 (#181), Qwen3.8 Max: 73.2 (#20)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Math12721499
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4—46.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—100%
ProofBench—58%

Knowledge Qwen3.8 Max leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 33.3 (#205), Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#27)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Expert12151507
GPQA Diamond—92.7%
SimpleQA Verified—47.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini Advanced 0514: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 37.2 (#75)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Vision—1314
Furniture Assembly—20%

Multilingual Qwen3.8 Max leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.6 (#192), Qwen3.8 Max: 56.7 (#18)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Non-English12741472
LMArena Chinese12741538
LMArena French13071503
LMArena German12751483
LMArena Japanese12421467
LMArena Korean12321461
LMArena Russian12831481
LMArena Spanish12421492

Instruction Following Qwen3.8 Max leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.0 (#212), Qwen3.8 Max: 77.6 (#17)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Instruction Following12531479

Long Context Qwen3.8 Max leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#207), Qwen3.8 Max: 45.6 (#31)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Longer Query12531489

Writing & Preference Qwen3.8 Max leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.5 (#200), Qwen3.8 Max: 67.1 (#30)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Text12791483
LMArena Creative Writing12841479
LMArena Multi-Turn12691489

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini Advanced 0514 or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.8 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.5 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and Qwen3.8 Max share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Max has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper