Model comparison

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 vs Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 xAI

37.7

Rank #198 Confirmed

Qwen3.8 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

56.8

Rank #22 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 Max in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.8 Max leads 73.2 to 35.4.

Side by side

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 and Qwen3.8 Max specifications
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Qwen3.8 Max
ProviderxAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.756.8
Released2024-08-132026-08-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1739

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.8 Max leads

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 37.0 (#199), Qwen3.8 Max: 53.5 (#29)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Coding12691502
DeepSWE—57.5%
LMArena WebDev—1674
FrontierSWE—17.8%
SciCode—53.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.4 (#14)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Qwen3.8 Max
APEX-Agents—63.3%
τ²-bench Banking—55.1%
GDP.pdf—23.2%

Reasoning Qwen3.8 Max leads

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 24.8 (#159), Qwen3.8 Max: 54.4 (#26)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts12551496
NYT Connections (extended)—88.3%
CritPt—20%
Chess Puzzles—40%
Mystery Game Puzzles—38%
DTBench—92%
LMCA—46.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.41

Math Qwen3.8 Max leads

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 35.4 (#185), Qwen3.8 Max: 73.2 (#20)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Math12651499
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4—46.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—100%
ProofBench—58%

Knowledge Qwen3.8 Max leads

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.9 (#200), Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#27)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Expert12381507
GPQA Diamond—92.7%
SimpleQA Verified—47.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 37.2 (#75)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Vision—1314
Furniture Assembly—20%

Multilingual Qwen3.8 Max leads

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.4 (#208), Qwen3.8 Max: 56.7 (#18)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Non-English12571472
LMArena Chinese12621538
LMArena French12861503
LMArena German12731483
LMArena Japanese12131467
LMArena Korean11951461
LMArena Russian12611481
LMArena Spanish12791492

Instruction Following Qwen3.8 Max leads

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.5 (#220), Qwen3.8 Max: 77.6 (#17)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Instruction Following12451479

Long Context Qwen3.8 Max leads

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#196), Qwen3.8 Max: 45.6 (#31)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Longer Query12661489

Writing & Preference Qwen3.8 Max leads

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.3 (#211), Qwen3.8 Max: 67.1 (#30)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Text12811483
LMArena Creative Writing12421479
LMArena Multi-Turn12651489

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better than Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.8 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.5 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 and Qwen3.8 Max share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Max has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper