Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 7b IT vs Qwen1.5-7B
Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Qwen1.5-7B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.3 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen1.5-7B in 5 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen1.5-7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 31.3 | 31.4 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.5 (#284), Qwen1.5-7B: 32.2 (#276)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1084 | 1107 |
| HumanEval+ | 35.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 45% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 20.5 (#238), Qwen1.5-7B: 20.4 (#240)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1071 | 1065 |
Math Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#220), Qwen1.5-7B: 31.4 (#224)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1107 | 1080 |
Knowledge Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#247), Qwen1.5-7B: 28.7 (#243)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1039 | 1055 |
| MMLU | — | 62.6% |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.1 (#273), Qwen1.5-7B: 28.5 (#271)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1052 | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1061 | 1141 |
| LMArena Russian | 1046 | 1006 |
| LMArena French | 1065 | — |
| LMArena German | 1054 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 971 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 988 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1049 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.0 (#283), Qwen1.5-7B: 54.1 (#281)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1057 | 1058 |
Long Context Qwen1.5-7B leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.1 (#272), Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#266)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1056 | 1090 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.4 (#288), Qwen1.5-7B: 29.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1094 | 1083 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1060 | 1035 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1040 | 1062 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT better than Qwen1.5-7B?
Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Qwen1.5-7B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.3 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT or Qwen1.5-7B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (31.5 vs 32.2); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Qwen1.5-7B share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-7B has 13.