Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 7b IT vs Wizardlm 13b
Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Wizardlm 13b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.3 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher in 6 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 31.3 | 31.4 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.5 (#284), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1084 | 1035 |
| HumanEval+ | 35.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 45% | — |
Reasoning Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 20.5 (#238), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1071 | 1018 |
Math Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#220), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1107 | 1017 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#247), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1039 | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.1 (#273), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1052 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1061 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1065 | — |
| LMArena German | 1054 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 971 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 988 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1046 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1049 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.0 (#283), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1057 | 1048 |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.1 (#272), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1056 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.4 (#288), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1094 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1060 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1040 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT better than Wizardlm 13b?
Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Wizardlm 13b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.3 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.5 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.