Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 53.6 to 29.3.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 43.0 |
| Released | — | 2026-06-12 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.95 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $4 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 31.8 (#268), Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.4 (#92)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 30.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 30.1% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1473 |
| SciCode | — | 47.5% |
| WeirdML | — | 54.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 886.23 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: —, Kimi K2.7 Code: 23.9 (#115)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 37.6% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,083 |
Reasoning Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 20.5 (#219), Kimi K2.7 Code: 38.2 (#56)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 57.9% |
| CritPt | — | 10% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 48.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 150.01 |
Math Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 30.1 (#212), Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.6 (#39)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 54% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 12.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1135 | — |
Knowledge Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.3 (#229), Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.6 (#51)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 36.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.5 (#252), Kimi K2.7 Code: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | — |
| LMArena French | 1156 | — |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 58.1 (#258), Kimi K2.7 Code: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.2 (#245), Kimi K2.7 Code: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.6 (#258), Kimi K2.7 Code: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Kimi K2.7 Code?
Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?
Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 31.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Kimi K2.7 Code share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.