Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 61.6 to 36.5.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 43.4 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273), MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1469 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1438 |
| SciCode | — | 43.1% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 513.95 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224), MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1450 |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
Math MiMo-V2.5 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212), MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1436 |
| ProofBench | — | 16% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231), MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1460 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: —, MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1247 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.5 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257), MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1468 |
| LMArena French | 1157 | 1447 |
| LMArena German | 1114 | 1421 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | 1306 |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | 1363 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | 1416 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263), MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1434 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.5 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250), MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1445 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263), MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1428 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1393 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1445 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than MiMo-V2.5?
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2 2b IT or MiMo-V2.5 better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and MiMo-V2.5 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.