Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs Mistral Medium 3.1
Gemma 2 2b IT and Mistral Medium 3.1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.5 vs 31.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.1 leads 55.6 to 36.6.
- Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 31.5 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 105K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 31.8 (#268), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | — |
Reasoning Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 20.5 (#219), Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.1 (#336)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 6.5% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 20.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 30.1 (#212), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.3 (#229), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.5 (#252), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | — |
| LMArena French | 1156 | — |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 58.1 (#258), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.2 (#245), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | — |
Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.1 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.6 (#258), Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.6 (#140)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1476 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Mistral Medium 3.1?
Gemma 2 2b IT and Mistral Medium 3.1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.5 vs 31.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Mistral Medium 3.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3.