Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs Qwen3-4B
Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3-4B leads 33.0 to 29.3.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3-4B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 31.5 |
| Released | — | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 31.8 (#268), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: —, Qwen3-4B: 27.3 (#94)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 35.7% |
Reasoning Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 20.5 (#219), Qwen3-4B: 18.5 (#264)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | — |
Math Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 30.1 (#212), Qwen3-4B: 28.5 (#228)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 38.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 52.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1135 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3-4B leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.3 (#229), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#198)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 52.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.5 (#252), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | — |
| LMArena French | 1156 | — |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 58.1 (#258), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.2 (#245), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.6 (#258), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Qwen3-4B?
Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Qwen3-4B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.